Skyscanner vs Workday

Skyscanner and Workday both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over Workday (rank #278) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 46). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Workday. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Workday is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Workday. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Workday.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Workday shows 1,102 stars across 57 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 7.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Workday looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.