Skyscanner vs Wrike

Skyscanner and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 34). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Wrike.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 29.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.