Skyscanner vs Zammad

Skyscanner and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 49). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Zammad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Zammad.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.