Skyscanner vs Zapier
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Skyscanner and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zapier (rank #27) holds a modest lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 49). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zapier is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zapier is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Zapier. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is clearly ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zapier is ahead of Skyscanner.
Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,768 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors.
Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Zapier looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Skyscanner | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #209 | #27 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 49 | 64 |
| Code | 67 | 68 |
| Education | 72 | 73 |
| Community | 40 | 37 |
| Reach | 32 | 63 |
| Momentum | 41 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 8,167 | 6,768 |
| Forks | 1,526 | 1,358 |
| Public repos | 86 | 296 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 13 |
| External contributors | 39 | 23 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 79 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 43 |