SmartRecruiters vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
SmartRecruiters and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over SmartRecruiters (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 40). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of SmartRecruiters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), SmartRecruiters is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is ahead of SmartRecruiters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SmartRecruiters is clearly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is clearly ahead of SmartRecruiters.
SmartRecruiters carries 119 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 5.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
SmartRecruiters is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Typeform looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SmartRecruiters | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 50 |
| Code | 56 | 71 |
| Education | 65 | 51 |
| Community | 12 | 25 |
| Reach | 76 | 43 |
| Momentum | 6 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 119 | 590 |
| Forks | 17 | 254 |
| Public repos | 25 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 8 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 38 |