SolarWinds vs Thomson Reuters
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
SolarWinds and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SolarWinds (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Thomson Reuters (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SolarWinds is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is ahead of SolarWinds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SolarWinds is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is ahead of SolarWinds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters.
SolarWinds carries 1,101 GitHub stars across 104 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 436 stars across 143 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
SolarWinds is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SolarWinds | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 33 |
| Code | 54 | 44 |
| Education | 50 | 66 |
| Community | 33 | 21 |
| Reach | 34 | 45 |
| Momentum | 62 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,101 | 436 |
| Forks | 471 | 166 |
| Public repos | 104 | 143 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 8 |
| External contributors | 18 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 30 |