SolarWinds vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
SolarWinds and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SolarWinds and UXPin sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (35), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of SolarWinds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SolarWinds is ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is slightly ahead of SolarWinds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of UXPin.
SolarWinds carries 1,101 GitHub stars across 104 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
SolarWinds is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UXPin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SolarWinds | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 35 |
| Code | 54 | 30 |
| Education | 50 | 66 |
| Community | 33 | 13 |
| Reach | 34 | 39 |
| Momentum | 62 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,101 | 879 |
| Forks | 471 | 117 |
| Public repos | 104 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 3 |
| External contributors | 18 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 21 |