SolarWinds vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
SolarWinds and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over SolarWinds (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 35). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of SolarWinds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is clearly ahead of SolarWinds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of SolarWinds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of Zammad.
SolarWinds carries 1,101 GitHub stars across 104 public repos, with 35 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 5.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
SolarWinds is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SolarWinds | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 52 |
| Code | 54 | 63 |
| Education | 50 | 71 |
| Community | 33 | 70 |
| Reach | 34 | 0 |
| Momentum | 62 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,101 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 471 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 104 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 35 | 9 |
| External contributors | 18 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 35 |