World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Sophos vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Sophos and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Sophos (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 37). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Sophos. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sophos is ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Sophos. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Sophos. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sophos is ahead of Teamwork.com.
Sophos carries 1,438 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Sophos is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Sophos | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 48 |
| Code | 33 | 58 |
| Education | 68 | 59 |
| Community | 33 | 37 |
| Reach | 11 | 47 |
| Momentum | 42 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,438 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 432 | 384 |
| Public repos | 84 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 14 |
| External contributors | 2 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 38 |