Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.
Spreedly vs Sprout Social
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Spreedly (Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.) and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sprout Social (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Spreedly (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Spreedly is slightly ahead of Sprout Social. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sprout Social is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Spreedly is slightly ahead of Sprout Social. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sprout Social is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of Spreedly.
Spreedly carries 418 GitHub stars across 67 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Spreedly is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Spreedly | Sprout Social |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 41 |
| Code | 50 | 48 |
| Education | 50 | 52 |
| Community | 19 | 17 |
| Reach | 40 | 41 |
| Momentum | 19 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 418 | 313 |
| Forks | 286 | 122 |
| Public repos | 67 | 68 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 4 |
| External contributors | 2 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 30 |