Squarespace vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Squarespace and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Squarespace (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 36). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Squarespace. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Squarespace. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Squarespace. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Squarespace is clearly ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is ahead of Squarespace.
Squarespace carries 2,038 GitHub stars across 98 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors.
Squarespace is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Squarespace | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 53 |
| Code | 35 | 66 |
| Education | 64 | 85 |
| Community | 21 | 47 |
| Reach | 29 | 8 |
| Momentum | 40 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,038 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 568 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 98 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 23 |
| External contributors | 1 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 37 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 34 |