Starling Bank vs Swiggy
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Starling Bank (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Swiggy (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Swiggy is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of Swiggy.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 317 stars across 22 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Swiggy looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Swiggy |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #668 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 32 |
| Code | 50 | 36 |
| Education | 55 | 55 |
| Community | 9 | 30 |
| Reach | 63 | 18 |
| Momentum | 48 | 32 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 317 |
| Forks | 29 | 94 |
| Public repos | 3 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 2 |
| External contributors | 0 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 37 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 32 |