Starling Bank vs Tealium Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Tealium Inc. (Tealium is the data hub for digital business.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Tealium Inc. (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 33). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of Tealium Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is ahead of Tealium Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Tealium Inc. is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Tealium Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Tealium Inc. is slightly ahead of Starling Bank.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Tealium Inc. shows 212 stars across 130 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Tealium Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Tealium Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 40 |
| Code | 50 | 34 |
| Education | 55 | 40 |
| Community | 9 | 62 |
| Reach | 63 | 16 |
| Momentum | 48 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 212 |
| Forks | 29 | 231 |
| Public repos | 3 | 130 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 13 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 27 |