Starling Bank vs Thomson Reuters

Starling Bank and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Starling Bank and Thomson Reuters sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters.

Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 438 stars across 144 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.