Starling Bank vs Unbounce
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Unbounce both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Unbounce (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Unbounce is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Unbounce is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Unbounce is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Unbounce. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Unbounce.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Unbounce shows 179 stars across 35 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Unbounce looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Unbounce |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 35 |
| Code | 50 | 51 |
| Education | 55 | 68 |
| Community | 9 | 14 |
| Reach | 63 | 37 |
| Momentum | 48 | 25 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 179 |
| Forks | 29 | 39 |
| Public repos | 3 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 6 |
| External contributors | 0 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 28 |