Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Starling Bank vs UptimeRobot

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Starling Bank and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

UptimeRobot (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 33). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of UptimeRobot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of UptimeRobot. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Starling Bank.

Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.

Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UptimeRobot looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricStarling BankUptimeRobot
Ranking
Overall rank#625#510
Pillars
Overall3337
Code5038
Education5562
Community935
Reach6328
Momentum4852
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars19581
Forks2924
Public repos39
Active repos (90d)36
External contributors010
Avg polish5839
Avg AI-readiness1437

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Starling Bank developer profileView UptimeRobot developer profile