Starling Bank vs UserTesting

Starling Bank and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Starling Bank (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over UserTesting (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UserTesting is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UserTesting is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of UserTesting. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of UserTesting.

Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Starling Bank's footprint is roughly 13.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UserTesting looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.