Starling Bank vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UXPin is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of UXPin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of UXPin.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UXPin's footprint is roughly 4.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UXPin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 35 |
| Code | 50 | 30 |
| Education | 55 | 66 |
| Community | 9 | 13 |
| Reach | 63 | 39 |
| Momentum | 48 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 879 |
| Forks | 29 | 117 |
| Public repos | 3 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 3 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 21 |