Building the world's most human financial company
Starling Bank vs Wealthsimple
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Wealthsimple (Building the world's most human financial company) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Starling Bank (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Wealthsimple (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 30). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wealthsimple is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Wealthsimple. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Wealthsimple. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of Wealthsimple.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Wealthsimple shows 138 stars across 102 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wealthsimple looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Wealthsimple |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #727 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 30 |
| Code | 50 | 58 |
| Education | 55 | 52 |
| Community | 9 | 9 |
| Reach | 63 | 40 |
| Momentum | 48 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 138 |
| Forks | 29 | 85 |
| Public repos | 3 | 102 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 3 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 39 |