Starling Bank vs Zeplin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Zeplin both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zeplin (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 33). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Zeplin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zeplin is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zeplin is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Zeplin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Zeplin.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zeplin shows 1,460 stars across 57 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zeplin's footprint is roughly 7.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zeplin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Zeplin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 40 |
| Code | 50 | 49 |
| Education | 55 | 77 |
| Community | 9 | 28 |
| Reach | 63 | 20 |
| Momentum | 48 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 1,460 |
| Forks | 29 | 228 |
| Public repos | 3 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 8 |
| External contributors | 0 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 54 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 26 |