Starling Bank vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 33). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc..
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 45 |
| Code | 50 | 76 |
| Education | 55 | 65 |
| Community | 9 | 39 |
| Reach | 63 | 37 |
| Momentum | 48 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 337 |
| Forks | 29 | 199 |
| Public repos | 3 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 33 |
| External contributors | 0 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 61 |