Starling Bank vs Zuora
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Starling Bank and Zuora both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zuora (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is ahead of Zuora. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zuora is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zuora is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Zuora. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Zuora.
Starling Bank carries 195 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zuora shows 10 stars across 21 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Starling Bank's footprint is roughly 19.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Starling Bank is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zuora looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Starling Bank | Zuora |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 35 |
| Code | 50 | 35 |
| Education | 55 | 73 |
| Community | 9 | 33 |
| Reach | 63 | 32 |
| Momentum | 48 | 2 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 195 | 10 |
| Forks | 29 | 38 |
| Public repos | 3 | 21 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 1 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 30 |