Sample integrations built by Stripe.
Stripe Samples vs Taiga.io
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) and Taiga.io (Your Agile, Free and Open Source Project Management Tool) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a meaningful lead over Taiga.io (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 32). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Taiga.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Taiga.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is ahead of Taiga.io. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Taiga.io is clearly ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Taiga.io.
Stripe Samples carries 4,227 GitHub stars across 30 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. Taiga.io shows 3,457 stars across 19 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors.
Stripe Samples is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Taiga.io looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Stripe Samples | Taiga.io |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #141 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 53 | 32 |
| Code | 66 | 39 |
| Education | 85 | 58 |
| Community | 47 | 33 |
| Reach | 8 | 35 |
| Momentum | 52 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 4,227 | 3,457 |
| Forks | 2,301 | 1,190 |
| Public repos | 30 | 19 |
| Active repos (90d) | 23 | 11 |
| External contributors | 8 | 9 |
| Avg polish | 76 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 29 |