Stripe vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Stripe and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe (rank #1) holds a meaningful lead over Typeform (rank #189) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (76 vs 50). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe is ahead of Typeform. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe is clearly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe is clearly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is slightly ahead of Stripe. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe is clearly ahead of Typeform.
Stripe carries 44,519 GitHub stars across 97 public repos, with 64 repositories active in the last 90 days and 124 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stripe's footprint is roughly 75.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Stripe is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Stripe | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #1 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 76 | 50 |
| Code | 80 | 71 |
| Education | 85 | 51 |
| Community | 60 | 25 |
| Reach | 40 | 43 |
| Momentum | 78 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 44,519 | 590 |
| Forks | 11,562 | 254 |
| Public repos | 97 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 64 | 8 |
| External contributors | 124 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 87 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 61 | 38 |