Swiggy vs Perk

Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Perk (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Perk is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Swiggy is slightly ahead of Perk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Perk is ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is ahead of Swiggy.

Swiggy carries 314 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Swiggy's footprint is roughly 9.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Swiggy is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Perk looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.