Swiggy Public Repos
Swiggy vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Swiggy is slightly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Swiggy is ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of Swiggy.
Swiggy carries 314 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Swiggy is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Swiggy | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 35 |
| Code | 36 | 30 |
| Education | 55 | 66 |
| Community | 30 | 13 |
| Reach | 18 | 39 |
| Momentum | 34 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 314 | 879 |
| Forks | 93 | 117 |
| Public repos | 22 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 3 |
| External contributors | 1 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 37 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 21 |