World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Teamwork.com vs Zapier
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zapier (rank #27) holds a modest lead over Teamwork.com (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 48). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zapier is ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zapier is ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is ahead of Teamwork.com. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zapier is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Teamwork.com carries 2,108 GitHub stars across 123 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,768 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zapier's footprint is roughly 3.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Teamwork.com is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zapier looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Teamwork.com | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #27 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 64 |
| Code | 58 | 68 |
| Education | 59 | 73 |
| Community | 37 | 37 |
| Reach | 47 | 63 |
| Momentum | 27 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,108 | 6,768 |
| Forks | 384 | 1,358 |
| Public repos | 123 | 296 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 13 |
| External contributors | 13 | 23 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 79 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 43 |