Teamwork.com vs Zulip

Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 36). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zulip is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zulip is ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Zulip. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zulip is ahead of Teamwork.com.

Teamwork.com carries 2,108 GitHub stars across 123 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zulip's footprint is roughly 15.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Teamwork.com is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zulip looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.