tray.ai vs Userlike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
tray.ai and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Userlike (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over tray.ai (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), tray.ai is slightly ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Userlike is ahead of tray.ai. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), tray.ai is slightly ahead of Userlike.
tray.ai carries 300 GitHub stars across 49 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but tray.ai's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
tray.ai is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | tray.ai | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 43 | 43 |
| Education | 61 | 85 |
| Community | 18 | 12 |
| Reach | 4 | 20 |
| Momentum | 17 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 300 | 38 |
| Forks | 109 | 5 |
| Public repos | 49 | 14 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 3 |
| External contributors | 1 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 36 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 35 |