tray.ai vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
tray.ai and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over tray.ai (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 31). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of tray.ai. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of tray.ai.
tray.ai carries 300 GitHub stars across 49 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
tray.ai is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | tray.ai | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 45 |
| Code | 43 | 76 |
| Education | 61 | 65 |
| Community | 18 | 39 |
| Reach | 4 | 37 |
| Momentum | 17 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 300 | 337 |
| Forks | 109 | 199 |
| Public repos | 49 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 33 |
| External contributors | 1 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 61 |