Typeform vs UserTesting

Typeform and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #191) holds a modest lead over UserTesting (rank #691) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 31). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UserTesting is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of UserTesting. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is clearly ahead of UserTesting.

Typeform carries 590 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 39.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Typeform is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UserTesting looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.