Typeform vs Zammad

Typeform and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over Typeform (rank #189) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 50). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is slightly ahead of Zammad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is slightly ahead of Typeform.

Typeform carries 590 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 10.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Typeform is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.