Typeform vs Zeplin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Typeform and Zeplin both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Zeplin (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 40). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Zeplin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zeplin is clearly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zeplin is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Zeplin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Zeplin.
Typeform carries 590 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zeplin shows 1,460 stars across 57 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.
Typeform is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zeplin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Typeform | Zeplin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #189 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 50 | 40 |
| Code | 71 | 49 |
| Education | 51 | 77 |
| Community | 25 | 28 |
| Reach | 43 | 20 |
| Momentum | 31 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 590 | 1,460 |
| Forks | 254 | 228 |
| Public repos | 40 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 8 |
| External contributors | 5 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 75 | 54 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 26 |