Typeform vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Typeform and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 45). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Typeform. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Typeform.
Typeform carries 590 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Typeform is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Typeform | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #189 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 50 | 45 |
| Code | 71 | 76 |
| Education | 51 | 65 |
| Community | 25 | 39 |
| Reach | 43 | 37 |
| Momentum | 31 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 590 | 337 |
| Forks | 254 | 199 |
| Public repos | 40 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 33 |
| External contributors | 5 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 75 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 61 |