Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫
Unsplash vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Unsplash (Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Unsplash (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 43). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of Unsplash. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Unsplash is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Unsplash. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Unsplash is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is slightly ahead of Unsplash.
Unsplash carries 9,930 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.
Unsplash is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Unsplash | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 52 |
| Code | 56 | 63 |
| Education | 72 | 71 |
| Community | 33 | 70 |
| Reach | 40 | 0 |
| Momentum | 34 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,930 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 829 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 63 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 9 |
| External contributors | 3 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 60 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 35 |