The Full-Stack UX Design Platform
UXPin vs Vimeo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) and Vimeo (You know, for videos.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Vimeo (rank #209) holds a modest lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 35). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Vimeo is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Vimeo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Vimeo is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Vimeo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Vimeo is clearly ahead of UXPin.
UXPin carries 879 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Vimeo shows 14,779 stars across 105 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Vimeo's footprint is roughly 16.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
UXPin is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Vimeo looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | UXPin | Vimeo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 49 |
| Code | 30 | 63 |
| Education | 66 | 50 |
| Community | 13 | 45 |
| Reach | 39 | 19 |
| Momentum | 34 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 879 | 14,779 |
| Forks | 117 | 3,071 |
| Public repos | 25 | 105 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 19 |
| External contributors | 0 | 19 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 38 |