The Full-Stack UX Design Platform
UXPin vs Workable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin and Workable sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (35), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Workable is ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is slightly ahead of UXPin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is slightly ahead of Workable.
UXPin carries 879 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
UXPin is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Workable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | UXPin | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 35 |
| Code | 30 | 51 |
| Education | 66 | 56 |
| Community | 13 | 24 |
| Reach | 39 | 41 |
| Momentum | 34 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 879 | 785 |
| Forks | 117 | 135 |
| Public repos | 25 | 96 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 5 |
| External contributors | 0 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 49 |