The Full-Stack UX Design Platform
UXPin vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 35). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of UXPin.
UXPin carries 879 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
UXPin is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | UXPin | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 45 |
| Code | 30 | 76 |
| Education | 66 | 65 |
| Community | 13 | 39 |
| Reach | 39 | 37 |
| Momentum | 34 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 879 | 337 |
| Forks | 117 | 199 |
| Public repos | 25 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 33 |
| External contributors | 0 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 61 |