The Washington Post vs Wrike

The Washington Post and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

The Washington Post (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 34). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is ahead of The Washington Post.

The Washington Post carries 2,751 GitHub stars across 91 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but The Washington Post's footprint is roughly 10.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

The Washington Post is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.