One place for all your team’s video-ing
Wistia vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Wistia (One place for all your team’s video-ing) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over Wistia (rank #278) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 46). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of Wistia. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wistia is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Wistia. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wistia is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is slightly ahead of Wistia.
Wistia carries 680 GitHub stars across 173 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 9.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Wistia is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Wistia | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 52 |
| Code | 45 | 63 |
| Education | 77 | 71 |
| Community | 21 | 70 |
| Reach | 40 | 0 |
| Momentum | 34 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 680 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 173 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 173 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 23 | 9 |
| External contributors | 2 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 43 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 29 | 35 |