The company behind WooCommerce, the open-source commerce platform for WordPress.
Woo vs Zapier
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Woo (The company behind WooCommerce, the open-source commerce platform for WordPress.) and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zapier (rank #27) holds a modest lead over Woo (rank #103) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 55). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zapier is clearly ahead of Woo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Woo is ahead of Zapier. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is clearly ahead of Woo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Woo is ahead of Zapier.
Woo carries 23,045 GitHub stars across 247 public repos, with 47 repositories active in the last 90 days and 100 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,774 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Woo's footprint is roughly 3.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Woo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zapier looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Woo | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #103 | #27 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 55 | 64 |
| Code | 68 | 68 |
| Education | 46 | 73 |
| Community | 51 | 37 |
| Reach | 34 | 63 |
| Momentum | 74 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 23,045 | 6,774 |
| Forks | 15,386 | 1,358 |
| Public repos | 247 | 296 |
| Active repos (90d) | 47 | 13 |
| External contributors | 100 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 79 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 43 |