Workable vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Workable and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 35). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Workable.
Workable carries 785 GitHub stars across 96 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Workable is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Workable | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 45 |
| Code | 51 | 76 |
| Education | 56 | 65 |
| Community | 24 | 39 |
| Reach | 41 | 37 |
| Momentum | 30 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 785 | 337 |
| Forks | 135 | 199 |
| Public repos | 96 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 33 |
| External contributors | 5 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 61 |