Back to index

latticeHQ

@latticeHQ

29Ecosystem scorePoor

Last refreshed 7/9/2026, 7:53:01 AM

latticeHQ Overview & Summary

Rank #693 · 31/100

latticeHQ ranks 693rd overall in the AI category with a composite score of 31 out of 100. The score summarises how the organization presents itself to developers across GitHub, its documentation, its packages and the wider community.

Its documentation and learning material and code quality come across as middling, with room to improve, and are what most developers will notice first when they land on the organization. By contrast, its developer experience and shipping velocity look minimal today, which is the clearest area where a small amount of focused work would visibly move the needle. Taken together, the picture is of a company whose public developer surface is neither uniformly polished nor uniformly weak, and where different audiences (contributors, integrators, evaluators) will likely form very different first impressions depending on which door they walk through.

latticeHQ maintains 10 public repositories on GitHub, built primarily in TypeScript, HCL and Go, which together have collected 1 stars and drawn contributions from 1 developers outside the core team, 1 of those repositories have seen commits in the last 90 days, a useful proxy for how much of the codebase is genuinely alive rather than archived.

For anyone evaluating latticeHQ as a technology choice, weighing a contribution, integrating the APIs, or comparing it against similar companies in the space, the sections below break down each of these signals in detail and link straight through to the underlying repositories, documentation and community threads that inform the score.

At a glance

Public repos
10
Total stars
1
Active (90d)
1
Outside contributors
1
Foundation
What the company ships
44Weak
Traction
How the ecosystem responds
13Poor
Foundation
Traction

Latest content

Loading…