Back to index

Teamwork.com

@Teamwork

World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!

45Ecosystem scoreWeak

Last refreshed 7/9/2026, 1:44:05 PM

Teamwork.com Overview & Summary

Rank #237 · 48/100

Teamwork.com ranks 237th overall in the SaaS category with a composite score of 48 out of 100. The organization describes itself as World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!, which frames how developers first encounter the brand on GitHub, in package registries and in search results.

Its documentation and learning material and code quality come across as solid, and are what most developers will notice first when they land on the organization. By contrast, its developer experience and shipping velocity look minimal today, which is the clearest area where a small amount of focused work would visibly move the needle. Taken together, the picture is of a company whose public developer surface is neither uniformly polished nor uniformly weak, and where different audiences (contributors, integrators, evaluators) will likely form very different first impressions depending on which door they walk through.

Teamwork.com maintains 123 public repositories on GitHub, built primarily in JavaScript, Go and Kotlin, which together have collected 2,108 stars and drawn contributions from 13 developers outside the core team, 14 of those repositories have seen commits in the last 90 days, a useful proxy for how much of the codebase is genuinely alive rather than archived.

For anyone evaluating Teamwork.com as a technology choice, weighing a contribution, integrating the APIs, or comparing it against similar companies in the space, the sections below break down each of these signals in detail and link straight through to the underlying repositories, documentation and community threads that inform the score.

At a glance

Public repos
123
Total stars
2,108
Active (90d)
14
Outside contributors
13
Foundation
What the company ships
54Weak
Traction
How the ecosystem responds
38Poor
Foundation
Traction

Latest content

Loading…